Could it be that the more we know about Jesus the less we know him?
While not a KJV-only guy in any sense, I'm not convinced the Bible-publishing explosion of our day is a net good. The mind-boggling variety of translations, paraphrases, and specialty Bibles is...waaay over the top, the most egregious being the ones with a slick mag-cover look. If you don't believe me peruse the Bible section at Books-a-Million or in the CBD sales paper.
The late radio extraordinaire, Paul Harvey, once said "if the devil wanted to reduce the power of the Bible he wouldn't have to destroy it, just dilute it." Reminds me of the Neil Postman line that with the extreme over-publishing of our day, "truth will be lost in a sea of irrelevance".
In light of those considerations, I loved it when I ran across this from the late, inimitable Malcolm Muggeridge in his book Jesus: The Man Who Lives.
"Meaning is often the enemy of truth, and in re-translating more exactly the words of the Gospels what they say so splendidly can easily be lost. [It may well be] that the more we knew about Jesus the less we knew him, and the more precisely his words were translated the less we understood or heeded them."
This, I think, critiques modernity and its love of all things exact. Of course we need accurate translations and of course the KJV is not the autographs in English form. I love the Message, JB Phillips, NLT, RSV, NASB, NKJV. They are all very helpful...and bewildering, too. But in a very real sense, I want my old Bible back. It simply is the mother tongue of English Scripture, and amazingly integral to the Anglo/American culture.
It is easy enough to observe that multiple translations have deeply wounded trans-generational Biblical literacy and memory. Multiple translations to choose from and which will you memorize? Which is used in the pulpit, at school, for personal devotions, at Bible club, youth group, summer camp? Several translations means the phraseology of that understanding gets fractured and never really settles into a collective awareness.
For the scholars, it is different -- they relish it all, understandably. The vast majority of us, though, need to be able to share the same words together. And when we can't, it is much easier to give up that Bible thing altogether. The Scriptures have lost their punch because we are not sure what the punch exactly is anymore -- it is lost in dilution: study notes, celebrity testimonials, glossy covers, 11 possible translations, and on and on.
I gladly repent of negative criticism -- this is not that. I ruminate for love of thoughts expressed, a happy love for God, and a desire to 'lean' into discussions that matter. In the end, for me, Paul Harvey's folksy observation proves true. Had I only one Bible, I would value it more. As I have way-too-many, not as much. Economics 101: High supply, low value.
That said, Muggeridge's further comments have spurred me on to read the Gospels again...and again. I want to hear the message clearly, worship Jesus more truly, follow Him more faithfully. And I honor those who labored through the centuries to pass along the scriptures with integrity. Truly they reveal the Word of life, full of grace and truth. And, as Muggeridge says, if the Gospels have survived their most recent commentators [and varied translations?] "then surely they must be considered immortal."
Indeed, immortal they are and tonight I gladly worship the One of whom they speak.
Sunday, May 13, 2018
Thursday, May 3, 2018
Yancey on Prayer
“We must stop setting our sights by the light of each passing ship;
instead we must set our course by the
stars.” (George Marshall)
“Prayer is the act of seeing reality from God's point of view.”
“Prayer is the act of seeing reality from God's point of view.”
Prayer adjusts our point of reference. With David we ask: “When I consider the heavens, the work of your hands, what is man
that you are mindful of him?” Our approach to prayer is our
approach to God, and approaching Him requires a massive adjustment of
scale. Why would
He even know we are here, much less be mindful.
“How odd that
prayer seems foolish to some people who base their lives on media
trends, superstition, instinct, hormones, social propriety, or even
astrology," Yancey observes. Indeed, in our sophistication we reject the unknown of prayer and embrace countless other unknowns all the same. Forgetting God, we create Him elsewhere.
In prayer, Yancey says, we usually get the
direction wrong. We start with out own concerns and bring them to
God. We inform God as if He did not already know. Instead, we should
start 'upstream' – start with God Himself.
The world obscures
the view from above. Prayer and only prayer helps us see things as
God see them.
- “Prayer allows me to admit my failures, weaknesses, and limitations to One who responds to human vulnerability with infinite mercy.”
- Prayer helps us “un-create the world we have fashioned” with out own ends in mind; it helps us quit playing God.
- Prayer has become “a realignment of everything. I pray to restore the truth...to gain a glimpse of the world, of me, through the eyes of God.”
- “Prayer is the act of seeing reality from God's point of view.”
Wednesday, May 2, 2018
Ministry Remnants: Gifts in Darkness
When we are in the darkness, we see nothing;
for once our experience is true.
To preach as a calling is a thing beyond words.
It calls us to use words.
And we leave words unsaid while saying too many.
This is about words unsaid. Or more specifically, some particular words left unsaid. There is no room to list the too many said.
In speaking of trials I spoke of Jesus in the desert, tempted of Satan. Considered broadly I tried to understand how our trials develop us; how God can speak even in darkest place; how God is best heard in the darkest place, for reasons.
Reason one, perhaps: in the dark place we feel our need most keenly and best receive help.
There are other reasons to be sure.
The one I stretch to grasp goes something like this: When we are in the darkness, we see nothing and for once our experience is true. For often we think we see when, in truth, we do not. It is the human condition to know what we don't know. Better to know we do not see and cry out for sight. Dark times help us do that. Much as we hate them, they are a way of hope and help.
These are remnants, left unsaid but wept over. There is more purpose in our trials than we can know. Even the inexplicable details, the faults, the impossible wait. The trial is a gift that helps us open our heart to God. When we push the trial away, it is God we lose.
As my friend, Loy, has it so often, echoing the Psalmist: Selah.
- - -
Next time I will morsel some crumbs about how it can be that these trials prepared Jesus for his ministry.
Jesus needed preparation? How can that be?
Tuesday, May 1, 2018
On Prayer
Concerning prayer: "I try to err on the side of honesty and not pretense." (Philip Yancey)
Not much of length or strength here, but some musings as I peruse the master-writer, Philip Yancey, and his 2002 book on prayer.
"When it comes to prayer," he says, "we are all beginners."
He discovers we value prayer highly but practice it little.
And he sees how prayer is tied to need. "I noticed that Christians in developing countries spend less time pondering the effectiveness of praying and more time actually praying." Need trumps talk.
He admits an imbalance in approach, a reaction to an approach that "promised too much and pondered too little." As a result, he tries "to err on the side of honesty and not pretense."
Finally, hear these closing comments from chapter one:
- "I have come to see prayer as a privilege, not a duty. Like all good things, prayer requires some discipline. Yet I believe that life with God should seem more like friendship than duty."
- "If prayer stands in the place where God and humans meet, then I must learn about prayer."
- Most of our struggles converge on this point: "why God doesn't act the way we want God to, and why I don't act the way God wants me to? Prayer is the precise point where those themes converge."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)